My last post talked about the year I had in real life, but this week is the by now
traditional summary of the year as seen through my blog. I am always interested
(and usually surprised) by the posts that have caught people’s attention over
the year. As ever, I have to point out that I use Blogger and Blogger’s analytics
really aren’t very good, so I can only say which posts were the most widely
read: I just don’t have reliable figures on how many people saw each one. I can
say that the number of people reading my blog seems to rise every year,
possibly in part because of people who have discovered it through Twitter. I
also seem to have the odd surge of interest from Russia. Friends of mine who
have experienced similar numbers of hits from the former USSR put it down to
lots of Russians interested in their books, but I suspect it’s hackers. But
then I’m a sad cynic.
Anyway,
enough of the caveats. What was my most popular blog of 2016?
Drumroll.
This
was, by a considerable margin, the most widely read post I have ever written.
Jane
Jackson produced a lovely new book in 2016: The
Master’s Wife. It’s a historical novel with much of the action in Egypt. It
includes scenes where our heroine travels into the desert and lives for a while
with the Bedouin.
I loved the book. I was particularly interested in the way that Ms Jackson handled scenes and situations not a million miles from events in Burke and the Bedouin. Like a lot of male authors writing stories where heroic men (and they almost always are men) fight off hordes of evil villains without a petticoat in sight, I have always harboured a deep suspicion of that sub-genre capitalised as Historical Romance. It’s an area where Jackson has a fine reputation with several nominations for major awards from the Romantic Novelists Association.
I loved the book. I was particularly interested in the way that Ms Jackson handled scenes and situations not a million miles from events in Burke and the Bedouin. Like a lot of male authors writing stories where heroic men (and they almost always are men) fight off hordes of evil villains without a petticoat in sight, I have always harboured a deep suspicion of that sub-genre capitalised as Historical Romance. It’s an area where Jackson has a fine reputation with several nominations for major awards from the Romantic Novelists Association.
It turns
out, though, that Jackson is also a fine historical writer even if no bodices
are being ripped and a heaving bosom is never pressed against a manly chest.
But I do think women do history differently from men and I describe some of the
differences here.
This was
a straightforward review of a book by an author I admire. It’s a romance,
though, and I’m not big on romance. I said so in the review and this seems to
have excited more interest than I expected, making it one of my most-read posts
ever.
Although
this was only published in December, it was my third most widely read post of
the year. Well, when I say “my” I mean it showed up on my web-site: it was actually
written by Jenny Kane, guest-blogging here as she has decided to move into
historical fiction and was writing about the Robin Hood legend and the
real-life background to The Outlaw’s
Ransom. She’s been on my blog before and she was very popular then too.
Perhaps I should just give up writing myself and pass my blog over to her.
I really
enjoy Nell Peters’ work, but it’s difficult to say why. I worry that it might
be because we share a warped sense of humour. Anyway, I gave up on trying to
review them and asked her onto my blog to speak for herself. The result was one
of the weirdest posts I’ve ever seen here and (disturbingly) one of the most
popular.
Terry
Tyler has been amazingly supportive of my writing, so I was very nervous when I
sat down to read hers. It’s always awkward if you read a book by someone you
know and don’t like it. Fortunately I did like it.
Why so many readers for a straightforward review? Because Terry is a star at using social media, that’s why. If you have books to sell, it’s worth watching her to see how it’s done. Terry’s Twitter handle is @TerryTyler4 and she blogs at http://terrytyler59.blogspot.co.uk.
Why so many readers for a straightforward review? Because Terry is a star at using social media, that’s why. If you have books to sell, it’s worth watching her to see how it’s done. Terry’s Twitter handle is @TerryTyler4 and she blogs at http://terrytyler59.blogspot.co.uk.
This
summer I gave a talk on James Brooke at the Llandrindod Wells Victorian Festival.
Swords featured.
This was
a short post suggesting that people might come to see it. Following Terry
Tyler’s advice, I promoted this like mad, with the result that hundreds of
people read the post. Sadly, not nearly as many made it to mid-Wales to see the
talk, but you can’t have everything.
So that was my six top-rated posts. Looking
back, it does seem that perhaps they are rather more about other people and
their books than about me and mine, but I did appear on a lot of other writers’
blogs when Back Home came out, so I
can’t really complain.
Just outside the top six was the compulsory
post about social media – always a popular read. (Social media and other random thoughts).
Further down, there were some serious posts about history and quite a lot about
the metallurgy and art of non-European swords. (It’s a thing of mine.)
A very pretty knife |
Unusually this year, there was only one post
from me on tango and this barely made the top twenty. But if any of you want to
know how to persuade someone to dance with you without saying a word, I wrote about this in August.
So, there we are. Book reviews, guest blogs,
history, swords and tango. Yes, that is pretty much the story of my life. Why
not join the party? It’s nice if you subscribe to the blog, though I’ve finally
fixed the ‘Comments’ section so you should be able to write about anything that
interests you here without being subscribed. Or comment on my author page on Facebook.
Or, if you prefer to make very pithy comments, there’s always Twitter: I’m
@TomCW99.
I look forward to hearing much more from you in
2017.
:-))
ReplyDeleteWhat fabulous company I'm in!
ReplyDelete